Appendix I: Appendix I

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

In model 2, Image measures the gap in outcome Y between the 1960s cohort of childhood immigrants and the Canadian-born comparison group in 1985 after adjusting for differences in Xi. In other words, the difference between Image (coefficient on the childhood immigrant indicator in Model 1) and Image (coefficient on the childhood immigrant indicator in Model 2), Image represents the portion of the observed gap in outcome Y between the 1960s cohort of childhood immigrants and their Canadian-born counterparts in 1985 that can be accounted for by differences in the observed individual characteristics. It can be demonstrated that Image when immigrant-specific characteristics are transformed as the deviation from the means of the 1960s cohort, where Image are means of Xi among the 1960s cohort of childhood immigrants in 1986 and Image are means of Xi among the Canadian-born comparison group in 1986. From equation 1, one can state that Image where Image is the mean outcome of the 1960s cohort of childhood immigrants in 1986 and Image is the mean outcome of the Canadian-born comparison group in 1986. From equation 2, one can state that ImageImage where Image are means of immigrant-specific variables. Since all immigrant-specific variables are transformed as the deviation from their respective means (in 1986), the means of these transformed variables equal 0. Accordingly, Image and Image Therefore Image or ImageImage

Similarly, Image reflects changes in the relative (to the comparison group) outcomes between the 1960s and 1970s cohorts after adjusting for compositional changes. The difference Image captures the portion of the change in the relative outcome between the 1960s and 1970s cohorts that can be accounted for by compositional changes. More specifically, it can be shown that Image where Image is a vector of means of Xi among the 1960s cohort of childhood immigrants in 1986 and Image is a vector of means of Xi among the Canadian-born comparison group in 1986; Image is a vector of means of Xi among the 1970s cohort of childhood immigrants in 1996 and Image is a vector of means of Xi among the Canadian-born comparison group in 1996; Image are differences in means of immigrant-specific variables between the 1960s and 1970s cohorts. On the basis of this equation, one can decompose Image into contributions due to factors common to immigrants and the Canadian-born comparison group (the sum of the first two terms) and due to immigrant-specific factors (the third term). Further, one can evaluate the relative contribution of each explanatory variable to Image. The interpretation of Image and Image also applies to Image and Image.

Next

Date modified: